Economic Regulation

Other things being equal, it is a good thing if firms compete hard with each other. It encourages them to be efficient and innovative, and to meet the needs of consumers. In principle, therefore, it is a good thing if there are hundreds of firms all competing to sell similar goods and services, and if their customers have reliable and comprehensive information about all the goods and services that are on offer. (But follow this link for a more detailed discussion of is competition really a good thing?)

However:

But companies which are subsidised, or dominate an industry, or offer complex products, can too easily become complacent and inefficient; and they may go even further and exploit their positions in order to charge higher prices and make excessive profits.

Governments in all modern economies have accordingly developed a range of policies which seek to balance one need (to grow large and efficient companies) against the other need (to protect customers against exploitation). These policies may be divided into those which address the following broad categories of potentially anti-competitive activity.

  1. Government protection, preference and subsidies (In Europe, this takes the form of developing the single market for goods and services, and reducing "state aids".)
  2. Protecting inventions etc. ("intellectual property")
  3. Price fixing ("cartels")
  4. Abuse of dominant position
  5. Mergers
  6. Inefficient Markets ("market studies and investigations")
  7. Utility monopolies and oligopolies

Within the UK government, policy development in most of these areas is the responsibility of the the Department for Business. Day-to day, however, all the policies are implemented by specialist agencies, as follows: